You might come up with a great solution to improve access or responsiveness – but not everyone seems to agree that it’s such a great idea. How can you plan for a successful change? What do you need to think about, do and say to make it more likely to achieve (and sustain) the change?
Consider people involved indirectly as well as those involved in the task or activity and key decision-makers.
Write down a list of all the people or roles you think you might need to consider. Ask other people to check if you have missed anyone off the list.
‘It’s just change for the sake of change.’
‘Yet another government-imposed change.’
‘How are we supposed to cope with yet more change?’
‘It’s going to be a real benefit for our patients.’
‘It feels really positive that we’re shifting our focus to support our patients to care for themselves.’
How can you change negative perceptions? Perceptions are not right or wrong – they are just how people see things. For change to be successful, people need to see the future, after the change, in a more positive light. They also need to agree with you that the practice cannot stay as it is. If the change is being imposed externally, you still need to identify meaningful reasons for change and potential positive outcomes for all those involved.
Preparation is everything. Step into the shoes of everyone you have identified as affected by change. What might they see as the main drawbacks? Start to identify meaningful reasons from their perspective as to why you need to change from how things are now, and the potential future benefits.
Expect early reactions to include concerns and discomfort – encourage people to be as specific as possible about what worries them.
Welcome the feedback you are given. When people express their thoughts and feelings about change, this is valuable. If you label disagreement, concerns or reluctance as ‘resistance’, you might not utilise the full value of the feedback you are being offered.
Feedback shows that people care and view the change as important – but make sure it is specific and not just discomfort with any kind of change. Probe people to help them pin down what’s driving their anxiety or the cause of their disagreement.
Be warned. Apathy or passive agreement may disguise a lurking problem, which can sabotage the change at a later time. It’s better to have all the concerns out in the open as early as possible.
Work with everyone including your critics to develop what you would like to change and how – involving them helps develop a sense of ownership. If there are too many people to work with simultaneously, ask individuals to be your ‘sounding board’ or ‘critical friend’, to spot flaws in your proposals and help develop better solutions. This is more effective than presenting the idea or solution without consultation and hoping people will agree with it.
In all your communications encourage people to spot flaws and flag up specific concerns. It helps you identify things you may have missed and shows that you value individual contributions. This input gives you a chance to develop a more workable design or solution – and reduces the power of potential saboteurs.
There are no case studies in this section.
There are no suppliers mentioned in this section.
There are no resources in this section.