This chapter covers small but effective changes in the waiting room, different systems like check-in screens, call boards, and health monitors
First impressions count. Your waiting room can leave a lasting impression. Using simple design principles and techniques can make the waiting room a more relaxed and calm environment, as well as provide educational opportunities for patients.
Many changes can be done cheaply. Practices should speak to their PCT to see if they qualify for any grants or schemes.
Time is precious for receptionist staff. At busy times, patients can sometimes queue for several minutes to let staff know they have arrived. Automated touch-screens allow patients to check themselves in for an appointment quickly.
Get volunteers from your PPG to assist patients with the machines until they get used to them.
Up to £3,000 for initial set-up for kiosk based solution. Maintenance charges of around £340 a year. (Speak to your PCT.)
These are large screens that can be used as information gateways, promoting health improvement messages for patients as they wait for their appointments. The screens can also be used to publicise services and call patients for their consultation.
There are numerous suppliers of screens but few that mesh with standard GP software.Practices can choose between sophisticated liquid crystal display (LCD)/plasma flat screens and the simpler, more cost-effective light emitting diode (LED) screens.
1. Is there a need for this technology?
2. Before you choose a system or screen, check whether your current GP system supplier offers any compatible products. Or whether the product you are considering will work with your system. Consider what features and functionality you require. For example, do you want the patient call facility or just a health information portal?
3. Think value for money. Is this the most cost-effective solution? Are there other mechanisms and other techniques, for example leaflets or other communications tools, that you should use?
4. Set aside time to train staff on how to use the system and get the most out of it. Ensure patients are made fully aware of the system too.
5. Ensure you monitor and evaluate. Do receptionists feel the system is working well? Do waiting patients pay attention to the screen? Has there been an increase in clinic attendances?
6. Think carefully about patient messaging. It could be a good opportunity to make people aware of recent did not attend (DNA) rates, a new appointment booking system or future dates for PPG meetings.
The time available during a clinical consultation must be divided between a number of tasks. Some can be delegated to members of the practice team other than GPs, for example collecting routine clinical information, conducting simple tests and updating patient records.
Many GP practices now share these tasks across practice nurses, healthcare assistants (HCAs) and administrative staff. This optimises GP time. This principle of delegation can be taken one logical step further – can patients be asked to complete some of these tasks for themselves?
Before investing in waiting room monitors, each practice should consider how it might integrate the system into their existing patient management processes.
In a sense it is no different from taking on an extra member of staff. It needs a room or space in which to operate, a private area with a desk where patients would feel comfortable taking clinical tests. The practice needs to work out which information, tests and data it will be set up to collect.
Both the practice clinical and administrative staff need to understand how using the ‘pod’ fits into the patient journey. Questions to consider include ‘what type of patient and when?’, followed by ‘how many times might this happen?’. The answers will help to assess the likely benefit and return compared to the effort and investment required. At the end of this section there is an account of a practice that has realised significant and tangible benefits from using the technology.
This section describes a series of practical steps for practices and discusses what is involved in each step:
Practices will need to judge, or better still measure, how much consultation time might be saved by the system generating and collecting data. Similarly, they need to describe accurately its use in a screening or health management programme context. System manufacturers list a number of variables it can be used for: weight and body mass index (BMI), oxygen saturation, pulse, blood pressure, clinical questionnaires etc.
Practices should assess compatibility using three criteria: patients, staff and technical. The practice’s existing clinical software system may not allow the ‘pod’ to write data directly into the electronic patient record. Practices should check this with the surgery pod manufacturer.
Practices will know immediately if space can be found for such a system to work. The practice team will sense whether their patients would find this acceptable and usable. If only a limited number of patients use the system or large numbers of patients need extensive help from staff, then potential benefits are reduced. In order to realise these benefits, an assessment also should be made of the staff’s ability to change processes and working practices where necessary.
Contact a manufacturer and get a quote for providing the system and maintenance.
On the basis of the previous three steps the practice should make their investment decision.
Once the purchasing decision is made, work should start immediately (before delivery and installation), to design new practice processes. Staff should work out where and how the system will be used, the training which will be delivered that allows all staff to understand the system, and how to help patients use it. The practice will need to ensure that the system is checked regularly and that testing materials are disposed of. You might wish to consider writing these duties into a role or job description. A key point in this design step is to ensure the system can completely replace current ways of working. Without ‘complete replacement’ a practice may run the risk of running multiple and potentially inefficient processes.
The system is delivered, installed and tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s policy.
Following staff training, the practice must maintain momentum. When staff are busy and under time pressure in a practice, there is a risk of reverting to ‘the old system’. Extra effort will be needed to support staff so this does not happen and the new investment pays off.
Revisit the original thinking in step 1 ‘Agree the need’ and collect data with the system in place and operating steadily. Assess any effects on consultation time, the number of patients that have used the system, the amount of data that has been collected and the degree to which staff may have had to help the patients use the system. Review successes and plan any adjustment or extension to the system.
There are no resources in this section.